The annular energy use predictions of three ground-coupling heat transfer calculation methods – the ITPE technique, the Bahnfleth method, and the Mitalas method – are compared for more than 100 slab and basement configurations. The comparative analysis is conducted for three locations – Minneapolis, Minnesota; Chicago, Illinois; and Phoenix, Arizona. Empirical data for two basements in Ottawa are also included. The comparative analysis shows that when an effective floor half-width is used, the ITPE technique predictions are in good agreement with both the Bahnfleth and Mitalas methods. It was found that the corrected two-dimensional ITPE method provides predictions of the total basement and slab heat loss within 5% for the annual means and within 15% for the annual amplitudes. The annual ground heat losses calculated by the three-dimensional ITPE method are found to agree well with those predicted by the Mitalas method for both slab and basement configurations. The agreement between the three-dimensional ITPE and the Mitalas methods was found to be within 6% for both annual means and annual amplitude of total building ground heat loss.
KEYWORDS: year 1995, comparing, energy consumption, ground, heat loss, heat flow, calculating, basements, slabs, buildings
Citation: ASHRAE Trans. 1995, Vol.101, Part 1, Paper number 3847, 158-172, 9 figs., 4 tabs., refs.
Product Details
- Published:
- 1995
- File Size:
- 1 file , 1 MB
- Product Code(s):
- D-16698
